Kawasaki VN750 Forum banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

8 Posts
Here is what I have as far as TEST DATA on K&N's. Nevermind the slick advertising and promotions and scores of users who have never TESTED them.

We have two diesel trucks and heard how much better the K&N's flow. We bought two and put one in each truck. In the course of 6 months the oil analysis ( http://www.blackstone-labs.com/ ) showed the silicon level in the used oil jumped from a baseline of 4-5 PPM ( 9 PPM is max allowed ) to 35PPM in each truck. Silicon is the amount of dirt/sand in the oil. Dirt/sand in the oil = BAD.

We switched back to OEM air filters and the silicon level came back to 5PPM on the next change. We always monitor the oil condition after a change to the engine, injectors, fueling etc.

Others in the truck group have noticed the same results.

Look here: http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm

Notice on the third graph from the top, "accumulative gain - total dirt passed", look how the vaunted K&N performed. The K&N passed 7grs of dirt, the OEM filter passed 0.4 grs of dirt.

Scores of K&N users will claim that they have not had any problems, of course not, abrasive damage is a slow process of accelerated wear.
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.